Arizona circumstances point out that causation can’t be decided in an appraisal. However can an appraisal go ahead to find out the prices of the hypothetical lined injury? It will seem to be an enormous waste of time for the reason that causation difficulty must be litigated. However, a federal court docket was confronted with this difficulty.1
The court docket dominated that causation couldn’t be decided by the appraisal panel:
The appraisal provision states, in pertinent half, ‘if we and also you disagree on the quantity of loss, both could make written demand for an appraisal of the loss.’ The supply describes an neutral course of involving two appraisers and an umpire to settle variations within the valuations of the property injury. Arizona Courts have decided that an appraisal clause solely permits the events to find out the quantity of injury via an appraisal and to not resolve questions of protection via such a continuing.
…
…The Arizona Courtroom of Appeals additional concluded that ‘the appraisers had been approved to find out solely a query of truth, specifically, the precise money worth of the insured constructing.’ Thus, in San Souci Residences, the Courtroom concluded that the ‘difficulty of whether or not the roof tiles had been broken by the hail storm and whether or not the supply of the injury is outdoors of the coverage limits just isn’t a dispute concerning the quantity of loss that each one events comply with be lined’ and was not throughout the scope of the appraisal provision.
…
Right here, in finest mild to Plaintiffs at this stage, the dispute between the events facilities on which structural engineer’s opinion, Plaintiffs’ structural engineer or Defendant’s structural engineer, is appropriate relating to the reason for the inspiration issues for which Plaintiffs search compensation from Defendant. Arizona regulation doesn’t ponder an appraiser’s central function as arbiter of which structural engineer’s opinion is appropriate. Appraisal just isn’t applicable to find out whether or not or not the fridge line leak induced the inspiration issues or whether or not these issues resulted from different, unrelated causes.
But, the court docket allowed the appraisal to go ahead to determine the quantity of the damages:
However, on the file earlier than the Courtroom, the Courtroom can not conclude that there isn’t a dispute between the events regarding the price of repairs to the inspiration and associated repairs. Defendant has not clearly acknowledged that it’s going to settle for Plaintiffs’ loss quantity for basis and basis associated repairs if protection is established. Below the insurance coverage contract written by Defendant, Plaintiffs are entitled to an appraisal relating to the price of basis and basis associated repairs. The Courtroom will compel an appraisal according to the phrases of the Coverage and according to the ‘robust choice in favor of permitting [Plaintiff] to invoke the appraisal clause.’
There will probably be an appraisal award for the damages, and the protection will probably be decided in litigation.
Thought For The Day
The Arizona desert to us is starkly stunning always, however when touched by the magic of Spring it turns into a land of enchantment.
—Raymond Carlson
1 Henderson v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 1:23-CV-00670 (D. Ariz Aug. 8, 2023).