Steve Badger and yours really substituted for appraisal educator Bob Norton eventually week’s Insurance coverage Appraisal and Umpire Affiliation certification course. One of many funnier points of the course is after we ask these sitting for the certification take a look at whether or not the reply to a selected hypothetical is “sure” or “no.” The proper reply is usually “it relies upon” as a result of some states rule a technique and others rule one other.
Whereas we have been educating the course, a Kansas federal decide decided concerning an insurer’s movement to disqualify the policyholder’s appraiser primarily based on the dearth of impartiality.1 As with most points involving insurance coverage, step one is to learn the insurance coverage coverage. The federal decide famous that the appraisal clause acknowledged, partly:
If we and also you disagree on the quantity of loss, both might make written demand for an appraisal of the loss. On this occasion, every celebration will choose a reliable and neutral appraiser….
The court docket then famous the insurer’s foundation for the appraiser’s disqualification:
Defendant seeks disqualification of Plaintiff’s chosen appraiser, Jeremy Cannefax, difficult his impartiality primarily based upon his alleged alignment with Wichita Dwelling Specialists (“WHS”), the contractor whose estimate kinds the idea for Plaintiff’s damages declare. Defendant argues Mr. Cannefax has refused to be totally clear regarding his relationship with WHS, though his feedback on the WHS Fb web page clearly present there’s a shut and ongoing relationship. Defendant additional argues Mr. Cannefax’s posts on the WHS Fb web page emphasize the final pro-insured/anti-insurer advocacy prevalent on that web page. Defendant’s movement is well-supported. Connected to the movement is the detailed Affidavit of its Area Staff Supervisor, Kent Garretson, together with 9 displays (WHS’s contract for providers with Plaintiff and its estimate, Plaintiff’s proof of loss, Mr. Garretson’s correspondence to Plaintiff, the Fb posts Mr. Cannefax made on WHS’s web page, and Mr. Cannefax’s electronic mail and ‘Declaration of Impartiality’).
You will need to observe that the policyholder’s legal professional failed to answer or rebut the insurer’s affidavits. Accordingly, the court docket accepted them as true and famous the idea for the ruling:
The Court docket finds that the fabric information set forth in Defendant’s movement—which Plaintiff has not disputed—set up on their face that Jeremy Cannefax, Plaintiff’s chosen appraiser, isn’t neutral as required by the Insurance coverage Coverage. Mr. Garretson, who’s chargeable for dealing with Plaintiff’s declare, states in his Affidavit that he carried out due diligence via on-line analysis concerning Mr. Cannefax, in accordance with the requirement of the Coverage, to find out whether or not Mr. Cannefax is “competent and neutral.” Throughout his analysis, Mr. Garretson accessed WHS’s Fb web page and found that Mr. Cannefax made a number of posts on that web page that Mr. Garretson thought of to be indicative of a relationship between Mr. Cannefax and WHS, in addition to a scarcity of impartiality on the a part of Mr. Cannefax. Defendant has thus proven that Mr. Cannefax has some kind of relationship with WHS via these Fb posts. No rebuttal is obtainable by Plaintiff.
Mr. Garretson additional states in his Affidavit that he despatched a letter to Plaintiff on July 14, 2023, asking for detailed data in regards to the extent of any monetary relationship with WHS and any monetary curiosity Mr. Cannefax may need within the end result of the appraisal and, particularly, any settlement for compensation he may need with WHS. Mr. Cannefax responded by electronic mail on July 19, 2023, stating that he thought the request for his ‘funds’ was ‘unreasonable’ and attaching his ‘Declaration of Impartiality’ on the stationery of an organization named ‘Blue Chip Consulting, Inc.’ The Court docket agrees with Defendant that Mr. Cannefax’s response is unpersuasive; he didn’t point out WHS or elucidate on the apparently shut relationship he has with that firm as demonstrated by his a number of posts on its Fb web page. Furthermore, it’s telling that Plaintiff by no means filed a response on this case making any arguments primarily based upon Mr. Cannefax’s July 19, 2023 electronic mail or his ‘Declaration of Impartiality.’
… the Court docket finds Defendant has sufficiently established that Plaintiff’s chosen appraiser must be disqualified as a result of he’s not neutral as required by the Insurance coverage Coverage on this case.
Through the IAUA course, I made the remark that the development is to disqualify appraisers the place the appraisal clause requires impartiality and the proposed appraisers labored on the declare or have work with the corporate making estimates on the declare. Judges will are likely to approve of appraisers not having a pre-conceived opinion primarily based on prior work on the declare.
Steve Badger identified that appraisers and umpires must be cautious about what they write on social media. Boasting about “profitable” an appraisal or acquiring greater or decrease awards in ads or social media merely reveals bias or impartiality. It’s vital that this federal decide discovered the Fb posts to be related proof, as Badger warned within the IAUA course.
For a Colorado perspective of impartiality, I counsel studying Appraisal and the Impartiality of Appraisers. For the Texas perspective, I’d counsel “Pissing In The Wind” Remark Disqualifies Appraiser From Appraisal Panel, and Texas Court docket Finds That Appraiser Does Not Should Be Neutral If Coverage Does Not Require Impartiality. For a Tennessee perspective, please go to Neutral Appraisers and Public Insurance coverage Adjusters. Once more, states have completely different views on the difficulty, and the panel to an appraisal must know the state legislation that applies to an appraisal.
I all the time be taught loads from the IAUA viewers questions. The IAUA is closing in on having over 1000 members. My hat is off to Bob Norton, previous IAUA presidents, and all of the Board members who’ve labored so arduous to construct this profitable group.
Thought For The Day
Justice can’t be for one facet alone, however have to be for each.
—Eleanor Roosevelt
1 L & M Auto Restore v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:23cv01203 (D. Kan. Jan. 17, 2024).