Why Time Issues In another way in Colorado for Householders, Enterprise House owners, and HOAs | Property Insurance coverage Protection Regulation Weblog


In Colorado, a home-owner’s time restrict for submitting a breach of contract lawsuit towards an insurance coverage firm for an unpaid or underpaid declare can differ from the closing dates imposed on enterprise homeowners and householders associations. 

Contractual Breach of Insurance coverage Coverage: 

Underneath Colorado Revised Statute § 13-80-101(1), a lawsuit primarily based on a breach of contract have to be filed inside three years after the reason for motion accrues. Nevertheless, insurers have the flexibility to contractually cut back this era. Notably, they’ll shorten it to as temporary as six months from the date of loss.1 Generally, insurance coverage carriers cut back this era to 1 to 2 years. 

In 2014, the Colorado State Legislature enacted Colorado Revised Statute § 10–4–110.8(12)(a) to safeguard householders. This provision prevents insurance coverage carriers from diminishing the three-year statute of limitations interval for claims made by householders. Consequently, insurers are prohibited from issuing or renewing insurance policies that require householders to sue inside a timeframe shorter than the legally prescribed statute of limitations.

(12)(a) However any provision of a home-owner’s insurance coverage coverage that requires the policyholder to file go well with towards the insurer, within the case of any dispute, inside a time frame that’s shorter than required by the relevant statute of limitations offered by regulation, a home-owner could file such a go well with inside the time frame allowed by the relevant statute of limitations . . . 

(b) On and after January 1, 2014, an insurer shall not concern or renew a home-owner’s insurance coverage coverage that requires the policyholder to file go well with towards the insurer, within the case of any dispute, inside a time frame that’s shorter than required by the relevant statute of limitations offered by regulation. 

Within the context of house owners associations, it seems that people who personal townhomes or condominiums is probably not labeled as “householders” beneath § 10–4–110.8(12)(a). Whereas there is no such thing as a controlling regulation on this concern, at the least three Colorado Federal District trial courts have held {that a} industrial entity holding a “Enterprise Proprietor’s Coverage” for townhomes or condominiums doesn’t fall inside the scope of a “home-owner” as contemplated by the statute.2 The courts reasoned that the statute’s language particularly targets “home-owner’s insurance coverage insurance policies” and makes no provision for industrial or enterprise insurance policies, even when they cowl residential constructions like townhomes or condominiums. In mild of this statutory interpretation, these trial courts concluded that Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10–4–110.8(12)(a) was inapplicable to insurance coverage insurance policies held by home-owner’s associations which can be primarily industrial in nature. 

It is very important word that the timing for the statute of limitations for householders, enterprise homeowners, and HOAs begins from the date of loss, not the date of discovery or the date of reporting.

That is why it’s important to evaluation an authorized copy of the coverage. Failing to fulfill key deadlines may jeopardize your declare and out there authorized cures.

You probably have questions on your declare, please contact our workplace


1 Grant Household Farms, Inc. v. Colo. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 155 P.3d 537, 538 (Colo. App. 2006); Union Well being & Accid. Co. v. Welch, 206 P. 790, 790 (Colo. 1922). 

2 Pinewood Townhome Affiliation, Inc. v. Auto House owners Insurance coverage Co., 2017 WL 590294, at *2-3 (D. Colo. Feb. 13, 2017); Brookshire Downs at Heatherridge Rental. Ass’n, Inc. v. House owners Ins. Co., 324 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1204 (D. Colo. 2018); Steeplechase II Rental. Ass’n, Inc. v. Vacationers Indem. Co., No. 17-CV-01273, 2018 WL 6571392, at *3 (D. Colo. Dec. 13, 2018)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *