Extra Medicaid Messiness – KFF Well being Information

The Host

Julie Rovner
KFF Well being Information


Learn Julie’s tales.

Julie Rovner is chief Washington correspondent and host of KFF Well being Information’ weekly well being coverage information podcast, “What the Well being?” A famous knowledgeable on well being coverage points, Julie is the writer of the critically praised reference guide “Well being Care Politics and Coverage A to Z,” now in its third version.

Federal officers have instructed a minimum of 30 states to reinstate Medicaid and Youngsters’s Well being Insurance coverage Program protection for half 1,000,000 folks, together with youngsters, after an errant pc program wrongly decided they had been not eligible. It’s simply the most recent hiccup within the yearlong effort to redetermine the eligibility of beneficiaries now that this system’s pandemic-era growth has expired.

In the meantime, the federal authorities is on the verge of a shutdown, as a small band of Home Republicans resists even a short-term spending measure to maintain the lights on beginning Oct. 1. A lot of the largest federal well being packages, together with Medicare, produce other sources of funding and wouldn’t be dramatically impacted — a minimum of at first. However almost half of all workers on the Division of Well being and Human Providers could be furloughed, compromising how nearly every little thing runs there.

This week’s panelists are Julie Rovner of KFF Well being Information, Rachel Roubein of The Washington Put up, Sandhya Raman of CQ Roll Name, and Sarah Karlin-Smith of Pink Sheet.


Sarah Karlin-Smith
Pink Sheet


Learn Sarah’s tales

Sandhya Raman
CQ Roll Name


Learn Sandhya’s tales

Rachel Roubein
The Washington Put up


Learn Rachel’s tales

Among the many takeaways from this week’s episode:

  • Officers in North Carolina introduced the state will develop its Medicaid program beginning on Dec. 1, granting 1000’s of low-income residents entry to well being protection. With North Carolina’s change, simply 10 states stay that haven’t expanded this system — but, contemplating these states have resisted even because the federal authorities has supplied pandemic-era and different incentives, it’s unlikely extra will observe for the foreseeable future.
  • The federal authorities revealed that just about half 1,000,000 people — together with youngsters — in a minimum of 30 states had been wrongly stripped of their well being protection below the Medicaid unwinding. The announcement emphasizes the tight-lipped strategy state and federal officers have taken to discussing the in-progress effort, although some Democrats in Congress haven’t been so hesitant to criticize.
  • The White Home is pointing to the potential results of a authorities shutdown on well being packages, together with issues enrolling new sufferers in medical trials on the Nationwide Institutes of Well being and conducting meals security inspections on the FDA.
  • Individuals are grappling with an uptick in covid circumstances, because the Biden administration introduced a brand new spherical of free check kits accessible by mail. However hassle accessing the up to date vaccine and questions on masking are illuminating the challenges of responding within the absence of a extra organized authorities effort.
  • And the Biden administration is angling to deal with well being prices on the govt stage. The White Home took its first step final week towards banning medical debt from credit score scores, because the Federal Commerce Fee filed a lawsuit to focus on non-public fairness’s involvement in well being care.
  • Plus, the White Home introduced the creation of its first Workplace of Gun Violence Prevention, headed by Vice President Kamala Harris.

Additionally this week, Rovner interviews KFF Well being Information’ Samantha Liss, who reported and wrote the most recent KFF Well being Information-NPR “Invoice of the Month,” a few hospital invoice that adopted a deceased affected person’s household for greater than a yr. In case you have an outrageous or infuriating medical invoice you’d prefer to ship us, you are able to do that right here.

Plus, for “further credit score,” the panelists recommend well being coverage tales they learn this week they assume it is best to learn, too:

Julie Rovner: JAMA Inside Medication’s “Comparability of Hospital On-line Value and Phone Value for Shoppable Providers,” by Merina Thomas, James Flaherty, Jiefei Wang, et al.

Sarah Karlin-Smith: The Los Angeles Occasions’ “California Employees Who Reduce Counter tops Are Dying of an Incurable Illness,” by Emily Alpert Reyes and Cindy Carcamo.

Rachel Roubein: KFF Well being Information’ “A Many years-Lengthy Drop in Teen Births Is Slowing, and Advocates Fear a Reversal Is Coming,” by Catherine Sweeney.

Sandhya Raman: NPR’s “1 in 4 Inmate Deaths Occur within the Similar Federal Jail. Why?” by Meg Anderson.

Additionally talked about on this week’s episode:

click on to open the transcript

Transcript: Extra Medicaid Messiness

KFF Well being Information’ ‘What the Well being?’Episode Title: Extra Medicaid MessinessEpisode Quantity: 316Printed: Sept. 27, 2023

[Editor’s note: This transcript was generated using both transcription software and a human’s light touch. It has been edited for style and clarity.]

Julie Rovner: Hi there and welcome again to “What the Well being?” I’m Julie Rovner, chief Washington correspondent for KFF Well being Information. And I’m joined by a number of the finest and smartest well being reporters in Washington. We’re taping early this week, on Wednesday, Sept. 27, at 10 a.m. As all the time, information occurs quick and issues would possibly’ve modified by the point you hear this, so right here we go.

We’re joined right this moment through video convention by Rachel Roubein of The Washington Put up.

Rachel Roubein: Good morning. Thanks for having me.

Rovner: Sandhya Raman of CQ Roll Name.

Sandhya Raman: Good morning.

Rovner: And Sarah Karlin-Smith of the Pink Sheet.

Sarah Karlin-Smith: Hello, everyone.

Rovner: Later on this episode we’ll have my KFF Well being Information-NPR “Invoice of the Month” interview with Samantha Liss. This month’s invoice is actually one which adopted a affected person to his household after his demise. However first, the information. I need to begin with Medicaid this week. North Carolina, which authorized however didn’t fund its Medicaid growth earlier this yr, authorized a price range this week that can launch the growth beginning Dec. 1. That leaves simply 10 states which have nonetheless not expanded this system to, largely, low-income adults, because the Reasonably priced Care Act made it potential in, checks notes, 2014. Another holdout states on the horizon? Florida is a risk, proper, Rachel?

Roubein: Sure. There’s solely technically three states that may do poll measures. Now North Carolina, I imagine, was the primary state to really move by means of the legislature since Virginia in 2018. A whole lot of the latest states, seven conservative-leaning states, as a substitute pursued the poll measure path. In Florida, advocates have been eyeing a 2026 poll measure. However the one difficulty in Florida is that they want a 60% threshold to move any constitutional modification, so that’s fairly, fairly excessive and would take numerous voter help.

Rovner: And they might want a constitutional modification to develop Medicaid?

Roubein: A whole lot of the states have been going the constitutional modification route by way of Medicaid lately. As a result of what they discovered was some legislatures would come again and attempt to change it, but when it’s a constitutional modification, they weren’t ready to do this. However numerous the holdout states don’t have poll measure processes, the place they might do that — like Alabama, Georgia, and so on.

Raman: Type of simply echoing Rachel that this one has been attention-grabbing simply because it had come by means of the legislature. And even with North Carolina, it’s been one thing that we’ve been eyeing for a couple of years, and that they’d gone just a little little bit of the best way, just a little little bit of the best way a couple of occasions. And it was form of the form of gettable one inside the ones that hadn’t expanded. And those we’ve got left, there’s simply actually not been a lot progress in any respect.

Rovner: I might say North Carolina, like Virginia, had a Democratic governor that ran on this and a Republican legislature, or a largely Republican legislature, therefore the persevering with standoff. It took each states a very long time to get to the place they’d been making an attempt to go. And also you’re saying the remainder of the states aren’t cut up like that?

Raman: Yeah, I believe it’ll be a way more tough hill to climb, particularly when, previously, we had extra incentives to develop with a number of the earlier covid aid legal guidelines, they usually nonetheless didn’t chew. So it’s going to be tougher to get these.

Rovner: Nobody’s holding their breath for Texas to develop. Anyway, whereas North Carolina will quickly begin including folks to its Medicaid rolls, the remainder of the states are shedding enrollees who gained protection through the pandemic however might not be eligible. And that unwinding has been bumpy to say the least. The most recent bump got here final week when the Division of Well being and Human Providers revealed that greater than half 1,000,000 folks, largely youngsters, had their protection wrongly terminated by as many as 30 states. It appears a pc program failed to notice that even when a guardian’s revenue was now too excessive to qualify, that very same revenue may nonetheless depart their youngsters eligible. But all the household was being kicked off due to the best way the construction of this system labored. I believe the massive query right here just isn’t that this occurred, however that it wasn’t observed sooner. It ought to have been apparent — youngsters’s eligibility for Medicaid has been increased than adults since a minimum of the Eighties. This unwinding has been occurring since this spring. How is that this solely being found now? It’s September. It’s the tip of September.

Roubein: Yeah. I imply, this was one thing advocates who’ve been carefully watching this have been ringing the alarm bells for some time, after which it took time. CMS [the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] had put one thing out, I imagine it was roughly two weeks earlier than they really then had the roughly half 1,000,000 youngsters regain protection — they’d put out a, “OK, nicely, we’re exploring which states.” And many reporters had been like, “OK, nicely which state is that this a problem?” So yeah, the method appeared prefer it took a while right here.

Rovner: I do know CMS has been tremendous cautious. I imply, I believe they’re making an attempt to not politicize this, as a result of they’ve been very cautious to not title states, and in lots of circumstances who they know have been wrongly dropping folks. I suppose they’re making an attempt to maintain it as apolitical as potential, however I believe there at the moment are some advocates who fear that possibly CMS is being just a little too cautious.

Karlin-Smith: Yeah, I believe from the opposite aspect too, in the event you’ve talked to state officers, they’re additionally making an attempt to be actually cautious and never criticize CMS. So it looks like each side aren’t eager to go there. However I imply some Democrats in Congress have been crucial of how the trouble has gone.

Rovner: Yeah. And naturally, if the federal government shuts down, as appears probably on the finish of this week, that’s not going to make this entire course of any simpler, proper? The states will nonetheless get to do what the states are doing. Their shutdown efforts, or their re-qualification efforts, aren’t federally funded, however the folks at CMS are.

Karlin-Smith: Yeah, that’ll simply throw one other thorn on this as we’re getting very, very probably headed in the direction of a shutdown at this level on the twenty seventh. So I believe that’ll be one other barrier for them regardless. And I imply, most CMS cash isn’t even affected by the yearly price range in any case as a result of it’s obligatory funding, however that’ll be a barrier for certain.

Rovner: So, talking of the federal government shutdown, it nonetheless appears extra probably than not that Congress will fail to move both any of the 12 common spending payments or a brief measure to maintain the lights on when the fiscal yr ends at midnight Sunday. That may result in the most important federal shutdown since 2013 when, enjoyable reality, the shutdown was an try to delay the rollout of the Reasonably priced Care Act. What occurs to well being packages if the federal government closes? It’s form of a giant complicated mess, isn’t it?

Roubein: Yeah, nicely, what we all know that may positively proceed and within the quick time period is Medicare and Medicaid, Obamacare’s federal insurance coverage market. Medicaid has funding for a minimum of the following three months, and there’s analysis growing vaccines and therapeutics that HHS, they put out their form of contingency “What occurs if there’s a shutdown?” plan. However there’s some issues that the White Home and others are form of making an attempt to level to that may be impacted, just like the Nationwide Institutes of Well being might not be capable to enroll new sufferers in medical trials, the FDA might have to delay some meals security inspections, and so on.

Rovner: Sarah, I truly forgot as a result of, additionally enjoyable reality, the FDA just isn’t funded by means of the remainder of the spending invoice that features the Division of Well being and Human Providers. It’s funded by means of the agriculture invoice. So although HHS wasn’t a part of the final shutdown in 2018 and 2019, as a result of the HHS funding invoice had already gone by means of, the FDA was kind of concerned, proper?

Karlin-Smith: Proper. So FDA is lumped with the USDA, the Agriculture Division, for the needs of congressional funding, which is all the time enjoyable for a well being reporter who has to observe each of these payments. However FDA is all the time form of a singular one with shutdown, as a result of a lot of their funding now’s person charges, significantly for particular sections. So the tobacco a part of FDA is sort of 100% funded by person charges, in order that they’re probably not impacted by a shutdown. Equally, numerous drug, medical system functions, and so forth are also completely funded by person charges, so their critiques preserve going. That mentioned, the best way person charges are, they’re actually designated to particular actions.

So, the place there isn’t person charges and it’s not thought-about a crucial form of public well being risk, issues do shut down, like Rachel talked about: numerous meals work and inspections, and even on the drug and medical system aspect, some actions which are associated that you simply would possibly assume would proceed don’t get funded.

Rovner: Sandhya, is there any risk that this received’t occur? And that if it does occur, that it’s going to get resolved anytime quickly?

Raman: At this level, I don’t assume that we are able to navigate it. So final night time, the Senate put out their bipartisan proposal for a seamless decision that you’d connect as an modification to the FAA, the Federal Aviation [Administration] reauthorization. And so that may briefly lengthen numerous the well being packages by means of Nov. 17. The difficulty is that it’s not one thing that if they can move that this week, they’d nonetheless need to go to the Home. And the Home has been fairly adamant that they need their very own plan and that the CR that they had been keen on had much more immigration measures, and issues there.

And the Home proper now has been busy making an attempt to move this week 4 of the 12 appropriations payments. And even when they completed the 4 that they did, that they’ve on their plate, that may nonetheless imply going to the Senate. And Biden has mentioned he would veto these, and it’s nonetheless not the 12. So at this level, it’s nearly unimaginable for us to not a minimum of see one thing short-term. However whether or not or not that’s long-term is I believe a query mark in all the oldsters that I’ve been speaking to about this proper now.

Rovner: Yeah, we are going to know quickly sufficient what’s going to occur. Nicely, in the meantime, as a result of there’s not sufficient already occurring, covid is again. Nicely, that relies upon the way you outline again. However there’s much more covid going round than there was, sufficient in order that the federal authorities has introduced a brand new spherical of free exams by mail. And there’s an up to date covid vaccine — I believe we’re not imagined to name it a booster — however its rollout has been bumpy. And this time it’s not the federal government’s fault. That’s as a result of this yr the vaccine is being distributed and paid for by largely non-public insurance coverage. And whereas plenty of folks in all probability received’t trouble to get vaccinated this fall, the individuals who do need the vaccine are having hassle getting it. What’s occurring? And the way had been insurers and suppliers not prepared for this? We’d been listening to the up to date vaccines could be accessible in mid-September for months, Sarah. I imply they actually actually weren’t prepared.

Karlin-Smith: Yeah. I imply, it’s probably not clear why they weren’t prepared, apart from maybe they felt they didn’t have to be, to some extent. I imply, usually, I do know I used to be studying often because we’ve additionally not too long ago gotten RSV [respiratory syncytial virus] vaccine approvals — usually they really have nearly like a yr, I believe, to form of add vaccines to plans and schedules and so forth, and pandemic covid-related legal guidelines actually shortened the time for covid. So they need to have been ready and prepared. They knew this was coming. And persons are going to pharmacies, or going to a health care provider’s appointment, they usually’re being instructed, “Nicely, we are able to provide the vaccine, however your insurance coverage plan isn’t set as much as cowl it but, although technically you have to be.” There looks like there’s additionally been plenty of distribution points the place once more, persons are going to websites the place they booked appointments, they usually’re saying, “Oh, truly we ran out.” They’re making an attempt one other web site. They’ve run out.

So, it’s kind of giving folks a way of the distinction of what occurs when kind of the federal government shepherds an effort and everyone — issues are a bit simplified, since you don’t have to consider which web site does your insurance coverage cowl. There’s a program for individuals who don’t have insurance coverage now who can get the vaccine without spending a dime, however once more, you’re extra restricted in the place you may go. There’s not these large free clinics; that’s actually impacting childhood vaccinations, as a result of, once more, numerous youngsters can’t get vaccinated on the pharmacy. So I believe persons are being reminded of what regular seemed like pre-covid, they usually’re realizing possibly we didn’t like this a lot in any case.

Rovner: Yeah, it’s not so environment friendly both. All of the individuals who mentioned, “Oh, the non-public sector may do that a lot extra effectively than the federal government.” And it’s like, we’re ending up with just about the identical points, which is the individuals who really need the vaccine are chasing round and never discovering it. And I do know HHS Secretary Becerra went and had this occasion at a D.C. pharmacy the place he was going to get his vaccine. And I believe the occasion was supposed to encourage folks to go get vaccinated, however it occurred proper on the time when the massive entrance surge of people that needed to get vaccinated couldn’t discover the vaccine.

Karlin-Smith: I believe that’s a giant concern as a result of we’ve had such low uptake of booster or extra covid pictures over the previous couple of years. So the people who find themselves kind of essentially the most go-getters, those who really need the pictures, are having hassle and feeling a bit defeated. What does that imply for the folks which are much less motivated to get it, who might not make a second or third try if it’s not simple? We kind of know, and I believe public well being of us form of beat the drum, that kind of simply assembly folks the place they’re, making it simple, simple, simple, is admittedly the way you get these items accomplished. So it’s onerous to see how we are able to enhance uptake this yr when it’s turn into extra sophisticated, which I believe goes to be a giant downside shifting ahead.

Rovner: Yeah. Proper. And clearly these are points that will likely be ironed out in all probability within the subsequent couple of weeks. However I believe what persons are going to recollect, who’re much less motivated to go get their vaccines, is, “Oh my God, these folks I do know tried to get it and it took them weeks. They usually confirmed up for his or her appointment they usually couldn’t get it.” And it’s like, “It was simply an excessive amount of hassle and I can’t cope with it.” And there’s additionally, I believe you talked about that there’s a problem with youngsters who’re too younger to get the vaccine too, proper?

Karlin-Smith: Proper. Nonetheless, I believe folks overlook that it’s important to be 6 months to get the vaccine. When you’re below 3, you principally can’t get it in a pharmacy, so it’s important to get it in a health care provider’s workplace. However lots of people are reporting on-line their physician’s workplace kind of stopped offering covid vaccines. So that they’re having hassle simply discovering the place to go. It looks like the distribution of pictures for youthful youngsters has additionally been a bit slower as nicely. And once more, this can be a inhabitants the place simply even main collection uptake has been an issue. And persons are on this bizarre hole now the place, in the event you can’t get entry to the brand new covid vaccine however your child is eligible, the outdated vaccine isn’t accessible.

So that you’re kind of on this hole the place your child may not have had any alternative but to get a covid vaccine, and there’s nothing for them. I believe we overlook typically that there are many teams of individuals which are nonetheless very weak to this virus — together with new child infants who haven’t been uncovered in any respect, and haven’t gotten an opportunity to get vaccinated.

Rovner: Yeah. So that is clearly nonetheless one thing that we have to proceed to take a look at. Nicely, in the meantime, masks mandates are making a comeback, albeit a really small one. And they aren’t going over nicely. I’ve personally been carrying a masks recently as a result of I’m touring later this week and subsequent, and don’t need to get sick, a minimum of not prematurely. However masks are, if something, much more controversial and political than they had been through the peak of the pandemic. Does public well being have any concepts that might assist reverse that pattern? Or are there another issues we may do? I’ve seen some plaintiff complaints that we’ve not accomplished sufficient about air flow. That could possibly be one thing the place it may assist, even when folks received’t or don’t need to put on masks. I imply, I’m shocked that vaccination continues to be just about our solely protection.

Karlin-Smith: I believe with masks, one factor that’s made it onerous for various elements of the well being system and lower-level form of state public well being departments to cope with masks is that the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] suggestions round masking are fairly free at this level. So The New York Occasions had an excellent article about hospitals and masking, and the form of steering round triggers they’ve given them are so obscure. They form of are left to make their very own choices. The CDC truly nonetheless actually hasn’t emphasised the worth of KN95 and N95 respirators over surgical masks. So I believe it turns into actually onerous for these lower-level establishments to kind of push for one thing that’s form of controversial politically. And lots of people are simply bored with it once they don’t have the help of these greater establishments saying it. And a few of simply even determining ranges of the virus and when that ought to set off masking.

It’s a lot tougher to trace these days as a result of a lot of our methods and information reporting is off. So, we’ve got this sense we’re in considerably of a surge now. Hospitalizations are up and so forth. However once more, it’s quite a bit simpler for folks to make these choices and determine when to drag triggers when you’ve clear information that claims, “That is what’s occurring now.” And to some extent we’re … once more, there’s numerous proof that factors to numerous covid going round now, however we don’t have that kind of onerous information that makes it quite a bit simpler for folks to justify coverage selections.

Raman: You simply introduced up air flow and it took time, one, for some scientists to appreciate that covid can also be unfold by means of ultra-tiny particles. Nevertheless it additionally took, after that, some time for the White Home to pivot its technique to stress air flow measures along with masks, and face overlaying. So numerous locations are nonetheless form of behind on having higher air flow in an workplace, or form of wherever you’re going.

Rovner: Yeah, I imply, one would assume that bettering air flow in faculties would enhance, not solely not spreading covid, however not spreading the entire respiratory viruses that preserve youngsters out of college and that make everyone sick through the winter, through the college yr.

Roubein: I used to be going to piggyback on one thing Sarah mentioned, which was about how the CDC doesn’t have clear benchmarks on when there must be a suggestion for what’s excessive transmission within the hospital for them to reinstate a masks mandate or no matter. However there’s additionally nuance to think about there. Inside that there’s, is there a partial masking rule? Which is like: Does the well being care employees need to put on them versus the sufferers? And does which have sufficient profit by itself if it’s solely required to at least one versus the opposite? I imply, I do know that numerous of us have referred to as for extra strict guidelines with that, however then there’s additionally the oldsters which are nervous concerning the backlashes. This has gotten so politicized, what number of completely different medical suppliers have talked about angst at them, assaults at them, over the polarization of covid? So there’s so many issues which are intertwined there that it’s robust to institute one thing.

Karlin-Smith: I believe the opposite factor is we preserve forgetting this isn’t all about covid. We’ve realized numerous classes about public well being that could possibly be relevant, such as you talked about in faculties, past covid. So in the event you’re within the emergency room, as a result of you’ve most cancers and it’s essential to see a health care provider instantly. And also you’re sitting subsequent to anyone with RSV or the flu, it could even be useful to have that affected person carrying a masks as a result of if in case you have most cancers, you do not want so as to add considered one of these infectious illnesses on high of it. So it’s simply been attention-grabbing, I believe, for me to observe as a result of it appeared like at completely different factors on this disaster, we had been kind of studying issues past covid for the way it may enhance our well being care system and public well being. However for essentially the most half, it looks like we’ve simply form of gone again to the outdated methods with out actually fascinated with what we may incorporate from this disaster that may be useful sooner or later.

Rovner: I really feel like we’ve misplaced the “public” in public well being. That everyone is kind of, it’s each particular person for him or herself and the heck with everyone else. Which is precisely the alternative of how public well being is meant to work. However maybe we are going to bounce again. Nicely, shifting on. The Biden administration, through the Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau, the CFPB, took the primary steps final week to ban medical debt from credit score scores, which might be an enormous step for probably tens of thousands and thousands of Individuals whose credit score scores are at present affected by medical debt. Final yr, the three main credit score bureaus, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, agreed to not embrace medical debt that had been paid off, or was below $500 on their credit score stories. However that also leaves heaps and many folks with depressed scores that make it costlier for them to purchase homes, or lease an condo, and even in some circumstances to get a job. It is a actually large deal if medical debt goes to be faraway from folks’s credit score stories, isn’t it?

Roubein: Yeah. I believe that was an attention-grabbing transfer once they introduced that this week. As a result of the CFPB had talked about that in a report they did final yr, 20% of Individuals have mentioned that they’d medical debt. And it doesn’t essentially seem on all credit score stories, however such as you mentioned, it could possibly. And having that monetary stress whereas going by means of a well being disaster, or somebody in your loved ones going by means of a well being disaster, is layers upon layers of issue. They usually had additionally mentioned of their report that medical billing information just isn’t an correct indicator of whether or not or not you’ll repay that debt in comparison with different kinds of credit score. And it additionally has the layers of insurance coverage disputes, and medical billing errors, and all that kind of factor. So this proposal that they’ve finally ends up being finalized as a rule, it could possibly be a giant deal. As a result of some states have been making an attempt to do that on a state-by-state stage, however nonetheless in fairly early phases by way of numerous states being on board. So this could be a large factor for a fifth of individuals.

Rovner: Yeah, many individuals. I’m going to offer a shout-out right here to my KFF Well being Information colleague Noam Levey, who’s accomplished an incredible venture on all of this, and I believe helped kind of push this alongside. Nicely, whereas we’re with reference to the Biden administration and cash in well being care, the Federal Commerce Fee is suing a non-public equity-backed docs group, U.S. Anesthesia Companions, charging anti-competitive habits, that it’s driving up the value of anesthesia providers by consolidating all the massive anesthesiology practices in Texas, amongst different issues. FTC Chair Lina Khan mentioned the company “will proceed to scrutinize and problem serial acquisitions roll-ups and different stealth consolidation schemes that unlawfully undermine honest competitors and hurt the American public.” This case can also be vital as a result of the FTC is suing not simply the anesthesia firm, however the non-public fairness agency that backs it, Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, which is among the large non-public fairness corporations in well being care. Is that this the shot throughout the bow for personal fairness and well being care that lots of people have been ready for? I imply, we’ve been speaking about non-public fairness and well being care for 3 or 4 years now.

Karlin-Smith: I believe that’s what the FTC is hoping for. They’re saying not simply that we’re going after anti-competitive practices in well being care, that, I believe, they’re making a transparent assertion that they’re going after this specific kind of funder, which we’ve seen has proliferated across the system. And I believe this week there was a report from the federal government displaying that CMS can’t even monitor the entire non-public fairness possession of nursing houses. So we all know this isn’t the one place the place docs’ practices being purchased up by non-public fairness has been seen as probably problematic. So this has been a really kind of activist, I believe, aggressive FTC in well being care on the whole, and in a lot of completely different sectors. So I believe they’re able to deliberate, with their actions and warnings.

Rovner: Yeah, it’s attention-grabbing. I imply, we largely assume, these of us who’ve adopted the FTC in healthcare, which will get fairly nerdy proper there, often consider large hospital teams making an attempt to consolidate, or insurers making an attempt to consolidate these big mega-mergers. However what’s been occurring quite a bit is these non-public fairness corporations have are available and purchased up doctor practices. And due to this fact they turn into the one suppliers of anesthesia, or the one suppliers of emergency care, or the one suppliers of kidney dialysis, or the one suppliers of nursing houses, and due to this fact they’ll set the costs. And people aren’t the extent of offers that have a tendency to come back earlier than the FTC. So I really feel like that is the FTC saying, “See you little folks which are doing large issues, we’re coming for you too.” Do we expect this would possibly dampen non-public fairness’s enthusiasm? Or is that this simply going to be a long-drawn-out battle?

Roubein: I may see it being extra of a long-drawn-out battle as a result of even when they’re displaying it for example, there’s simply so many ways in which this has been accomplished in so many form of sectors as you’ve seen. So I believe it stays to be seen additional down the road as this would possibly occur in a couple of alternative ways to a couple completely different of us, and the way that form of performs on the market. Nevertheless it would possibly take a while to get to that stage.

Karlin-Smith: I used to be going to say it’s all the time price additionally fascinated with simply the dimensions and price range of the FTC compared to the quantity of personal actors like this all through the well being system. So I imply, I believe that’s one purpose typically why they do attempt to form of use that grandstanding symbolic messaging, as a result of they’ll’t go after each dangerous actor by means of that formal course of. So that they need to do the signaling in several methods.

Raman: I believe in all probability as we’ve all realized as well being reporters, it takes a extremely very long time for there to be change within the well being care system.

Rovner: And I used to be simply going to say, one factor we find out about people who find themselves in well being care to generate profits is that they’re very artistic find methods to do it. So regardless of the guidelines are, they’re going to search out methods round them and we are going to simply kind of preserve taking part in this cat and mouse for some time. All proper, nicely lastly this week, a narrative that in all probability ought to have gotten extra consideration. The White Home final week introduced creation of the first-ever Workplace of Gun Violence Prevention to be headed by Vice President Kamala Harris. Its function will likely be to assist implement the very restricted gun regulation handed by Congress in 2022, and to coordinate different administration efforts to curb gun violence. I do know that that is largely for present, however typically don’t you actually need to elevate a problem like this to get folks to concentrate, to level out that possibly you’re making an attempt to do one thing? Discuss issues which were onerous for the federal government to do over the past couple of a long time.

Raman: It took Congress a very long time to then move a brand new gun bundle, which the capturing in Uvalde final yr ended up catalyzing. And Congress truly obtained one thing accomplished, which was extra restricted than some gun security advocates needed. Nevertheless it does take quite a bit to get gun security reform throughout the end line.

Rovner: I do know. I imply, it’s a kind of points that the general public actually, actually appears to care about, and that the federal government actually, actually, actually has hassle doing. I’ve been overlaying this so lengthy, I keep in mind once they first banned gun violence analysis at HHS again within the mid-Nineties. That’s how far again I am going, that they had been truly doing it. And the gun foyer mentioned, “No, no, no, no, no. We don’t really need these research that say that if in case you have a gun in the home, it’s extra more likely to injure anyone, and never essentially the dangerous man.” They had been very sad, and it took till three or 4 years in the past for that to be allowed to be funded. So possibly the concept that they’re elevating this considerably, to a minimum of wave to the general public and say, “We’re making an attempt. We’re preventing onerous. We’re not getting very far, however we’re positively making an attempt.” So I suppose we are going to see how that comes out.

All proper, nicely that’s this week’s information. Now, we are going to play my “Invoice of the Month” interview with Sam Liss, after which we’ll come again with our further credit. I’m happy to welcome to the podcast my KFF Well being Information colleague Samantha Liss, who reported and wrote the most recent KFF Well being Information-NPR “Invoice of the Month” installment. Welcome.

Liss: Hello.

Rovner: This month’s invoice includes a affected person who died within the hospital, proper? Inform them who he was, what he was sick with, and about his household.

Liss: Yeah. So Kent Reynolds died after a prolonged hospital keep in February of 2022. He was truly discharged after problems from colon most cancers, and died in his house. And his widow, Eloise Reynolds, was left with a collection of sophisticated hospital payments, and she or he reached out to us in search of assist after she couldn’t determine them out. And her and Kent had been married for simply shy of 34 years. They lived outdoors of St. Louis they usually have two grownup youngsters.

Rovner: So Eloise Reynolds acquired what she assumed was the ultimate hospital invoice after her husband died, which she paid, proper?

Liss: Yeah, she did. She paid what she thought was the ultimate invoice for $823, however a yr later she acquired one other invoice for $1,100. And he or she was confused as to why she owed it. And nobody may actually give her a adequate reply when she reached out to the hospital system, or the insurance coverage firm.

Rovner: Can a hospital even ship you a invoice a yr after you’ve already paid them?

Liss: You realize what, after trying into this, we realized that yeah, they really can. There’s not a lot in the best way that stops them from coming after you, demanding more cash, months, and even years later.

Rovner: So this was clearly a part of a dispute between the insurance coverage firm and the hospital. What grew to become of the second invoice, the year-later invoice?

Liss: Yeah. After Eloise Reynolds took out a yardstick and went line by line by means of every cost and she or he couldn’t discover a discrepancy or something that had modified, she reached out to KFF Well being Information for assist. And he or she was nonetheless skeptical concerning the invoice and didn’t need to pay it. And so after we reached out to the well being system, they mentioned, “Really, what? It is a clerical error. She doesn’t owe this cash.” And it kind of left her much more pissed off, as a result of as she defined to us, she says, “I believe lots of people would’ve ended up paying this extra quantity.”

Rovner: So what’s the takeaway right here? What do you do in the event you all of the sudden get a invoice that comes, what appears, out of nowhere?

Liss: The consultants we talked to mentioned Eloise did every little thing proper. She was skeptical. She in contrast, most significantly, the payments that she was getting from the hospital system in opposition to the EOBs that she was getting from her insurance coverage firm.

Rovner: The reason of advantages kind.

Liss: That’s proper. The reason of advantages. And he or she was evaluating these two in opposition to each other, to assist information her on what she must be doing. And since these had been completely different between the 2 of them, she was left much more confused. I believe of us that we spoke to mentioned, “Yeah, she did the correct factor by pushing again and demanding some explanations.”

Rovner: So I suppose the final word lesson right here is, in the event you can’t get satisfaction, you may all the time write to us.

Liss: Yeah, I hate to say that in a manner, as a result of that’s a tough resolution to scale for most folk. However yeah, I imply, I believe it factors to simply how complicated our well being care system is. Eloise gave the impression to be a reasonably savvy well being care shopper, and she or he even couldn’t determine it out. And he or she was fairly tenacious in her pursuit of constructing cellphone calls to each the insurance coverage firm and the hospital system. And I believe when she couldn’t determine that out, and she or he lastly turned to us asking for assist.

Rovner: So nicely, one other lesson realized. Samantha Liss, thanks very a lot for becoming a member of us.

Liss: Thanks.

Rovner: Hey, “What the Well being?” listeners, you already know that few issues in well being care are ever easy. So, in the event you like our present, I like to recommend you additionally hearken to “Tradeoffs,” a podcast that goes even deeper into our expensive, sophisticated, and infrequently counterintuitive well being care system. Hosted by longtime well being care journalist and good friend Dan Gorenstein, “Tradeoffs” digs into the proof and analysis information behind well being care insurance policies and tells the tales of actual folks impacted by choices made in C-suites, docs’ workplaces, and even Congress. Subscribe wherever you hearken to your podcasts.

OK, we’re again. It’s time for our extra-credit phase. That’s after we every suggest a narrative we learn this week we expect it is best to learn too. As all the time, don’t fear in the event you miss it. We’ll publish the hyperlinks on the podcast web page at kffhealthnews.org, and in our present notes in your cellphone or different cell system. Sarah, you had been the primary to decide on this week, so that you get to go first.

Karlin-Smith: Positive. I checked out a narrative within the Los Angeles Occasions, “California Employees Who Reduce Counter tops Are Dying of an Incurable Illness,” by Emily Alpert Reyes and Cindy Carcamo. Hopefully I didn’t mispronounce her title. They wrote a extremely fascinating however unhappy story about folks working in an trade the place they’re chopping engineered stone counter tops for folks’s kitchens and so forth. And due to the supplies on this engineered product, they’re inhaling particles that’s principally giving folks at a really younger age incurable and lethal lung illness. And it’s an attention-grabbing public well being story about kind of the dearth of safety in place for a number of the most weak employees. It looks like this trade is usually comprised of immigrant employees. Some who form of primarily go to … outdoors a Dwelling Depot, the story suggests, or one thing like that and form of get employed for day labor.

So they only don’t have the form of energy to kind of advocate for protections for themselves. And it’s simply additionally an attention-grabbing story to consider, as shoppers I believe persons are not all the time conscious of the prices of the merchandise they’re selecting. And the way that then interprets again into labor, and the well being of the folks producing it. So, actually fascinating, unhappy piece.

Rovner: One other product that it’s important to kind of … I keep in mind once they first had been having the tales concerning the mud in microwave popcorn injuring folks. Sandhya, why don’t you go subsequent?

Raman: So my further credit score this week is from NPR and it’s by Meg Anderson. And it’s referred to as “1 in 4 Inmate Deaths Occur within the Similar Federal Jail. Why?” That is actually attention-grabbing. It’s an investigation that appears on the deaths of people who died both whereas serving in federal jail or proper after. They usually checked out a number of the Bureau of Prisons information, and it confirmed that 4,950 folks had died in custody over the previous decade. However greater than 1 / 4 of them had been multi functional correctional facility in Butner, North Carolina. And the investigation discovered that the sufferers right here and nationwide are dying at a better fee, and the incarcerated of us aren’t getting take care of severe diseases — or very delayed care, till it’s too late. And the Butner facility has a medical middle, however numerous occasions the inmates are being transferred there when it was already too late. After which it’s actually unhappy the variety of deaths is simply rising. And simply, what will be accomplished to alleviate them?

Rovner: It was a extremely attention-grabbing story. Rachel.

Roubein: My further credit score, the headline is “A Many years-Lengthy Drop in Teen Births Is Slowing, and Advocates Fear a Reversal Is Coming,” by Catherine Sweeney from WPLN, in partnership with KFF Well being Information. And he or she writes concerning the nationwide teen beginning fee and the way it’s declined dramatically over the previous three a long time. And that, primarily, it’s nonetheless dropping, however preliminary information launched in June from the CDC reveals that that descent could also be slowing. And Catherine had talked to docs and different service suppliers and advocates, who primarily expressed concern that the complete CDC dataset launch later this yr can present an increase in teen births, significantly in Southern states. And he or she talked to consultants who pointed to a number of components right here, together with the Supreme Court docket’s resolution to overturn Roe v. Wade, intensifying political pushback in opposition to intercourse education schemes, and the affect of the pandemic on youth psychological well being.

Rovner: Yeah. There’ve been so many tales concerning the decline in teen beginning, which appeared largely attributable to them having the ability to get contraception. To get teenagers to not have intercourse was much less profitable than getting teenagers to have safer intercourse. So we’ll see if that tide is popping. Nicely, I’m nonetheless with reference to well being prices this week. My story is a research from JAMA Inside Medication that was carried out partially by Shark Tank panelist Mark Cuban, for whom well being worth transparency has turn into one thing of a campaign. This research is of a consultant pattern of 60 hospitals of various sorts carried out by researchers from the College of Texas. And it assessed whether or not the net costs posted for 2 widespread procedures, vaginal childbirth and a mind MRI, had been the identical as the costs given when a shopper referred to as to ask what the value could be. And shock. Largely they weren’t. And infrequently the variations had been very massive. In actual fact, to cite from the research, “For vaginal childbirth, there have been 5 hospitals with on-line costs that had been better than $20,000, however phone costs of lower than $10,000. The survey was accomplished in the summertime of 2022, which was a yr and a half after hospitals had been required to publish their costs on-line.” In some unspecified time in the future, it’s important to marvel if something goes to work to assist sufferers kind out the costs that they’re being charged for his or her well being care. Actually eye-opening research.

All proper, that’s our present for this week. As all the time, in the event you benefit from the podcast, you may subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. We’d recognize it in the event you left us a overview; that helps different folks discover us, too. Particular thanks as all the time to our superb engineer, Francis Ying. Additionally, as all the time, you may electronic mail us your feedback or questions. We’re at whatthehealth@kff.org. Or you may nonetheless discover me at X, @jrovner. Sarah.

Karlin-Smith: I’m @SarahKarlin, or @sarahkarlin-smith.

Rovner: Sandhya.

Raman: @SandhyaWrites

Rovner: Rachel.

Roubein: @rachel_roubein

Rovner: We will likely be again in your feed subsequent week. Till then, be wholesome.


Francis Ying
Audio producer

Emmarie Huetteman

To listen to all our podcasts, click on right here.

And subscribe to KFF Well being Information’ “What the Well being?” on SpotifyApple PodcastsPocket Casts, or wherever you hearken to podcasts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *