New sanctions on Russia and what it means for US corporations and MNCs

The Biden administration has intensified sanctions in opposition to Russia with the announcement of over 500 new measures on Feb. 23, marking the second anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

These sanctions, focusing on Russia’s monetary, army, and vitality sectors, pose important implications for US companies, particularly these within the insurance coverage business. Firms should now navigate the expanded restrictions, which might have an effect on transactions and the insurability of entities related to Russian pursuits.

Alexis Tsapralis (pictured above), analyst at Lockton, outlined the specifics of the brand new sanctions in a latest article. The sanctions embrace freezing $5 billion in belongings held by the Russian central financial institution and disconnecting choose Russian banks from the SWIFT monetary messaging system.

Moreover, the sanctions impose import bans on Russian oil, gasoline, and coal, prohibit investments in Russian vitality companies, and apply export controls on high-tech items and the diamond business.

Following go well with, the UK and EU have additionally enacted new sanctions in opposition to Russia. These actions underline the worldwide stance in opposition to Russia’s ongoing aggression and the violation of worldwide norms.

“Below the brand new sanctions, US entities are prohibited from finishing monetary transactions or conducting enterprise with entities positioned on the Workplace of International Property Management’s (OFAC) Specifically Designated Nationals and Blocked Individuals (SDN) record,” Tsapralis wrote. “In consequence, US insurers are prohibited from transacting with sanctioned entities and are legally required to dam belongings, together with insurance coverage insurance policies, for entities they insure that grow to be sanctioned.”

Moreover, OFAC’s 50% Rule prohibits transactions with entities which are 50% or extra owned by a number of blocked individuals, including one other layer of compliance for US companies.

The most recent sanctions additionally goal third-party intermediaries in international locations equivalent to China, Turkey, and the UAE that assist Russia’s army actions or its financial system, thereby extending the scope of entities that US insurers can’t cowl.

“The size of Western sanctions on Russia’s financial system has severely restricted the nation’s skill to have interaction in worldwide monetary and enterprise transactions. This new wave of sanctions comes on the heels of Russia’s elevated army spending, which instantly contributed to its 2.2% GDP development in 2023, in line with the IMF, regardless of the sanctions imposed by the US, UK, and EU since 2022,” Tsapralis wrote.

“So long as Russia continues its conflict in Ukraine and makes an attempt to bypass sanctions, the US and its allies are anticipated to persist in tightening measures,” she wrote.

Dangers in a extra stringent setting

“For multinational companies, making certain compliance with the brand new sanctions shall be important. Threat professionals ought to coordinate with their counsel to make sure that they adjust to OFAC’s sanctions applications, notably within the prolonged geographies of Turkey and the UAE,” Tsapralis wrote.

She maintained that US-based corporations ought to collaborate with their insurers to develop and keep sturdy, risk-based compliance measures. Multinational firms, in the meantime, additionally must assess the dangers of participating with corporations exterior of Russia which are linked to the Russian authorities or are subsidiaries of Russian enterprises.

“Multinational companies must also have interaction in rigorous due diligence to determine the chance of their provide chains being implicated in violations of worldwide regulation dedicated by Russia,” she wrote. “The US authorities additionally advises heightened human rights due diligence.”

MNCs are additionally urged to create and implement proactive methods that embrace thorough due diligence, frequent communication with threat administration companions, and a transparent understanding of the components influencing the sanctions applications of the US, UK, and EU.

The problem extends to produce chains, the place companies should determine and mitigate dangers associated to potential violations of worldwide sanctions or legal guidelines. Tsapralis additionally recommends heightened due diligence on human rights to align with US authorities advisories.

“Amongst different actions, organizations ought to guarantee they seize and combine pertinent info, conduct common due diligence screenings, and cling to OFAC’s 50% rule. Companies must also completely consider their world provide chains to determine potential publicity to sanctions applications and to anticipate how future sanctions might have an effect on their operations,” she wrote.

What are your ideas on this story? Please be happy to share your feedback under.