The insurable curiosity doctrine is a fundamental idea of insurance coverage regulation. A particularly well-written regulation assessment article by Blake Berscheid, Playing with the Way forward for Property Insurance coverage, discusses the underlying causes for the doctrine: 1
America’ fashionable property insurance coverage trade descended from seventeenth-century English marine insurance coverage. Lloyd’s of London, now world-renowned for its underwriting actions, began with humble beginnings as a espresso store within the late 1600s. Lloyd’s constructed a status in London as a hub for sharing transport and marine intelligence, finally creating right into a marine insurance coverage market. Nevertheless, extra speculative actions adopted, with ‘insurance coverage’ out there on all kinds of oddities. In response, laws was handed with the purpose of banning playing and wagering actions undertaken underneath the guise of insurance coverage. Lloyd’s maintained a status for playing ventures into the 20 th century, regardless of legal guidelines regulating playing inside insurance coverage current for over 100 and fifty years.
…
Wager insurance policies, as they have been referred to as, have been frequent within the 1730s and 1740s. The excellence drawn between ‘insurance coverage’ and ‘wager insurance policies’ was that ‘in insurance policies upon curiosity (‘insurance coverage’), you recuperate for the loss truly sustained, whether or not or not it’s complete or partial: however upon a wager coverage, you may by no means recuperate however for a complete loss,’ as a result of the chance is all or nothing. Lord Mansfield, an eighteenth century English choose, acknowledged insurance coverage as ‘a contract of indemnity, and of nice profit to commerce.’ Nevertheless Lord Mansfield additionally felt use of insurance coverage ‘was perverted by its being was a wager.’ Many insurance coverage merchandise departed from conventional societal advantages, and ‘as a substitute of confining the enterprise of insurance coverage to actual dangers, and contemplating them merely as an indemnity to the truthful vendor in opposition to any loss which he may endure in the middle of a buying and selling voyage … the apply of insuring ideally suited dangers [without proof of interest] … was rising to an alarming diploma.’ The insurance policies, ‘having no reference no matter to precise commerce or commerce, have been very justly thought of as mere gaming or wager insurance policies, and due to this fact the legislature thought it needed to provide them an effectual verify.’
Actions inside Lloyd’s didn’t go unnoticed by lawmakers and the ‘effectual verify’ got here with the Marine Insurance coverage Act of 1745, ‘which sought to place an finish to the apply of wagering disguised by marine insurance policies.’ The Act labelled wager insurance policies as a ‘mischievous form of Gaming or Wagering, underneath the Pretence of assuring the Risque on Transport, and truthful Commerce, the Establishment and laudable Design of constructing Assurances, hath been perverted; and that which was meant for the Encouragement of Commerce and Navigation, has … grow to be hurtful of, and harmful to the identical ….’ The regulation prohibited all types of insurance coverage the place assured events didn’t have an insurable ‘curiosity’ in the subject material. Passage of the Marine Act of 1745 apparently didn’t completely dissociate playing from insurance coverage actions. Clearly, Lloyd’s had earned a status inside London, with the London Chronicle writing in 1768 that ‘[t]he introduction and superb progress of illicit gaming at Lloyd’s coffee-house is amongst others a strong and really melancholy proof of the degeneracy of the instances.’
Lloyd’s acknowledged its personal shortcomings and the maybe inevitable involvement of the Crown, following passage of the 1745 Marine Insurance coverage Act. Initially, in 1771, a gaggle of Underwriters branched off to type ‘New Lloyd’s’ with the intent of distancing themselves from the disreputed practices of ‘Outdated’ Lloyd’s. After a number of years of failing to determine an acceptable everlasting dwelling, “New Lloyd’s” was formally established in 1774. On the first ‘New Lloyd’s’ assembly in March 1774, the next decision was handed: ‘Shameful Practices which have been launched of late years into the enterprise of Underwriting, equivalent to making Speculative Insurances on the Lives of Individuals and on Authorities Securities.’ The decision went on additional to advocate that ‘Insurers on the whole will refuse subscribing such Insurance policies, and that they are going to present a correct Resentment in opposition to any Coverage Dealer who shall hereafter tender such Coverage to them.’ ‘New Lloyd’s’ was began with a transparent acknowledged purpose of shifting away from its historic ‘illicit playing’ previous.
Whereas the Marine Act of 1745 required policyholders to have an ‘insurable curiosity,’ the statute didn’t specify what was thought of an insurable ‘curiosity.’ Clarification was supplied in an 1806 English Courtroom determination (Lucena v. Crauford), holding an insurable curiosity as, ‘a proper within the property, or a proper derivable out of some contract concerning the property, which in both case could also be misplaced upon some contingency affecting the possession or enjoyment of the celebration.’ This holding supplied an preliminary authorized definition of insurable curiosity, which stays a basis of insurance coverage at this time.
Marine insurance coverage continued to develop largely via frequent regulation selections, till the Marine Insurance coverage Act of 1906. This act codified substantive rules of marine insurance coverage developed via frequent regulation for the reason that 1745 Act. The 1906 Act included an express definition of ‘insurable curiosity,’ incorporating wording from the Marine Act of 1745 and ideas from Lucena v. Craufurd. The Act continues to be largely in pressure at this time.
The lesson from at this time’s submit is that one of many underlying causes for the requirement of “insurable curiosity” in a historic context is the assumption that an insurance coverage coverage shouldn’t be a wagering contract. There are different causes supporting the “insurable curiosity doctrine,” which might be mentioned in a follow-up submit.
Thought For The Day
Insurance coverage and playing each contain uncertainty. You’re not assured a return in your funding, however you’re keen to take the possibility for the potential payout.
—David Brown
1 Blake Berscheid, Playing with the Way forward for Property Insurance coverage, 58 Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J. 115 (2023).